A summary Resource for Geocentrism

A unique planetary orbital flower pattern around the stationary earth – http://www.geocentricperspective.com/Flower%20Pattern.htm

The problem of the Venus dichotomy has been resolved within a geocentric model and has not been resolved within a heliocentric model – http://www.geocentricperspective.com/Schroter.htm

The problem of the weather patterns on earth are clearly in favor of a stationary earth – http://www.geocentricperspective.com/Restoring%20forces.htm

The problem of negative parallax is in favor of a stellartum that moves around a stationary earth – http://www.geocentricperspective.com/Negative%20parallax.htm

Cosmic phenomena is in favor of geocentrism, such as – 

1. Quantized galaxy light periodicity showing the galaxies are located in concentric shells around the earth

2. Gamma ray burst focused on the earth

3. Quasars located in spherical shells around the earth

4. BLac and X-Ray bursts having earth centered periodicity

5. Specroscopic Binaries and Globular clusters – axis of binary stars are pointed towards the earth (Barr effect). Globular clusters are also focused on the earth.

6. Quantized planetary orbits – a law of planetary distances matches the preferred redshift of quasars with a ratio of 1:1.23.

7. Sloan digital survey showing the cosmic bodies are organized around the earth in broad shells

8 . Michelson Morley experiment showing a small fringe shift as an ether drift

9. Michelson Gale experiment showing a small fringe shift as an ether drift

10. Sagnac effect showing light moves at c+-v relative to the ether and absolute earth.

11. Many other experimental outcomes as discussed in GWW

There have even been symposiums such as the Copernicus Symposium II in 1973, in which a paper was submitted, entitled – Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data, in which evidence was presented for a non Copernican universe.

I also note that the apparently elegant heliocentric model is based upon a problematic Newtonian mechanics as shown here – http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php/116413-johnmartin2009-s-discussion-of-modern-physics?p=1904170#post1904170

I have also invalidated relativity theory here –
http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php/116413-johnmartin2009-s-discussion-of-modern-physics?p=1907731#post1907731

The posts (including the 58 invalidations) were made in a physics forum where most were avowed relativists and nobody bothered to provide any compelling answers to any of the arguments made after about 1500 viewings of the arguments.