Large and Small Numbers of Fossils of Species Concludes to Difficulties in Applying the Fossil Record to Support Evolutionary Theory.

The more fossils there are for a particular species at a particular time, the more likely that species became extinct in that are at that time. Consequent to the more fossils of a particular time, place and species, in the geological record the less likely there is any evidence for the evolution of that species. For if the fossils represent an extinction event, there is no evolution of the species. If the fossils represent a large loss of life, there are fewer genes in the gene pool to modify for the subsequent populations. And fewer genes infer less opportunity for modification and new speciation. The more fossils in the geological record at a particular time and place, the less likely there is any evolution of that species.

The fewer fossils there are for a particular species at a particular time, the less likely that causes are known and the less knowledge of heredity to trace any evolution of the species. The fewer the fossils, the less evidence there is for evolution.

Conclusion - if there is a great, or small number of fossils of a species, the existence of evolution is remote or knowledge of the causes of evolution are most uncertain. The fossil record is difficult to apply in support of evolutionary theory.

Evolution is false anyway as the false principle of more from less. So even if the above problems are answered, the fossils can never be used as evidence for a false principle.