A Problem of the Denial of Absolutes in Special Relativity Theory.

In accord with the principle of identity, all motion is always one with itself thereby an absolute.
The universe is also one with itself and thereby an absolute.
Yet all motion also relative to the universe.
But what is an absolute relative to another absolute is itself a known absolute.
For example, a shoe is an absolute, and a foot is an absolute.
The shoe is an absolute relative to the foot as another absolute.
Also what is relative to another absolute, is itself an absolute.
The shoe is relative to the foot as an absolute, and thereby itself an absolute shoe.
Therefore, the shoe is itself an absolute as known from itself and as known relative to another absolute.
Likewise, a motion is an absolute from 1) itself and from 2) a relative to the absolute of the universe.
And therefore any motion is always absolute.

In special relativity theory, all motion is relative to a local observer.
Yet special relativity theory posits motion with velocity v is not one with itself as seen by another observer as modified by gamma in the transform equations.
Yet all motion is an absolute motion as shown above.
Therefore, because the SR equations remove the absolute from the nature of motion, SR theory is only a paper theory that is not realist.