Special Relativity (SR) theory posits the universal speed of light at c.
The postulate of light at c everywhere is a postulate of absolute motion.
1) Then c is an absolute velocity.
SR theory posits the observer moves at v as a relative motion, relative to the thing being observed.
2) Then v is a relative velocity.
The transform equation requires the use of both c and v together in the same equation.
But c is an absolute velocity and v is only a relative velocity.
But if c is absolute, v is relative to c as an absolute velocity.
For an act relative to a known absolute is itself an act known in relation to an absolute value.
3) Then v is an absolute velocity.
2) contradicts 3)
Or, if v is only a relative velocity, then c is relative to v as a relative velocity.
But v is a relative velocity and c is an absolute velocity.
For an act known in relation to a relative act takes on the value of that from which it is known as relative.
4) Then c is a relative velocity.
1) contradicts 4)
Therefore there are two contradictions within SR theory in relation to the notions of velocity as both relative and absolute.
Therefore SR theory is false.
No comments:
Post a Comment